Text Size: A- A+ Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube

Breaking News

Pledge the Gift of Life

Each year, the lives of thousands of people across the country are saved because someone made the choice to become an organ donor. In April, Allegheny Health Network is honored to celebrate National Donate Life Month and pay tribute to all of those who have bestowed the precious gift of life to another through organ donation. Visit AHNdonate.org to learn more and register to be an organ donor.



Format: 04/24/2014
Format: 04/24/2014


Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Hospital infections hard to gauge

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

By Sean D. Hamill, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Next month, the Pennsylvania Department of Health will release its first full-year's worth of hospital-by-hospital data showing how many bloodstream, urinary tract and other infections patients contracted during hospital stays in 2009.

But even though the state has been collecting similar data since 2005, and anecdotal evidence indicates that at least some hospitals have made significant progress -- particularly in the Pittsburgh area -- it won't be possible to say how the state has done over the past half-decade in its nationally celebrated effort to reduce hospital-acquired infections.

That's because the way infection reporting has been collected and analyzed has changed so much year to year -- and agency to agency -- that drawing long-term conclusions using the state's data is impossible, state officials and experts say.

After all the work in the past decade that went into making Pennsylvania the first state in the country to publicly report hospital-acquired infection data, it's galling to those involved that the state is, in essence, starting all over again.

"There's been reporting out there that's bouncing all over the place and is just inconsistent -- and maybe some people like that," said Karen Wolk Feinstein, co-founder of the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative, which helped push for the state's first public reporting on infections.

While some hospitals with higher infection numbers might have a vested interest in obscuring the state's data, Ms. Feinstein said, "I know a lot of hospitals that are proud of their infection rate and the work they've done to get there. But it depends on the hospital."

This comes at a time when the national effort to reduce infections seems to have stagnated, even though 25 other states now have some form of hospital-acquired infection reporting -- some public, some not.

Although study after study has demonstrated how infection rates can be significantly reduced, a report issued last week by the U.S. Health and Human Services Department to Congress declared that "very little progress" had been made in eliminating hospital-acquired infections in recent years.

Nationally, the report found rates for three of five major types of serious hospital-related infections had increased in 2007 -- the last full year national data was available for analysis -- including an 8 percent increase in one of the most fatal infections, bloodstream infections following surgery.

Moreover, despite efforts to create a national, publicly available, hospital-by-hospital infection reporting system in the recently approved health care reform law, just a stripped-down version of it was enacted, using only a confidential reporting method. The law will impose financial penalties -- a 1 percent reduction in Medicare reimbursements -- on hospitals with the worst performance on a list of hospital-acquired conditions that include several types of infections.

Advocates say it's not nearly good enough.

"We need a national system that is standardized," said Lisa McGiffert, campaign director for the Safe Patient Project of Consumers Union, the advocacy arm of Consumer Reports. "We really need a system that shows every hospital's performance individually and not grouped together as a hospital system, like some reports allow. Individual hospitals in the same system can be very different."

Ms. McGiffert and others said a system like Pennsylvania's hospital-by-hospital public reporting is still the model, despite the problems that now hobble making long-term conclusions.

From 2005 to 2007, the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council issued infection reports before the Health Department took over in 2008 with a vastly different system of reporting.

"It's just not possible to compare all the information that PHC4 was collecting to what the Department of Health is now getting," said Mike Doering, executive director of the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority, a state agency that uses infection reporting to educate hospitals on best practices and problem areas.

"It's now a different set of infections that are reported, a different set of patients, even a different set of hospitals. Plus the data is collected in a different way," he said.

PHC4 collected data directly from all of the state's 165 acute-care hospitals, first in four infection categories -- urinary tract, pneumonia, bloodstream and surgical site -- and then two more, gastrointestinal and an "other" category.

The agency also reported on other categories that hospitals took particular issue with: how many people died after contracting infections; the average length of stay for someone with an infection; and how much patients were charged.

"That's one of the things we liked about PHC4; they collected data that people wanted to see," said Ms. McGiffert.

The state was lauded nationally for its public reporting, even as the state's hospitals and their lobbyists roundly criticized PHC4 reports as an unfair, unscientific reflection of their work. They pushed for a new system handled by the Health Department, which was approved in 2007.

"This is a more robust and actionable reporting system, rather than trying to create a system based on an overall hospital visitation rate" like PHC4 was using, said Paula Bussard, senior vice president of policy and regulatory services for the Hospital & Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania.

"It's not starting over. It's moving forward, and you always have to start somewhere," she said.


To read more, visit the Post-Gazette website.

West Penn Allegheny Health System
Tell us who you are:

What areas do you use on our website?*
(select more than one if it applies)

Did you find what you were looking for?

Would you refer others to our website?

Can we contact you for future questions?

CAPTCHA math question:* 1 + 1 =

Thank you for completing the West Penn Allegheny Health System website survey.
We value your feedback and comments.